This entry is all about
theoretical frameworks. After my PhD funding interview at Sussex (for which I was not
successful) I had feedback which outlined where my proposal was lacking – in
the framework area. So I’ve spent the past few days searching for whatever I
can find on theoretical frameworks, and come to the conclusion that I was in
the right place to begin with, using Bronfenbrenner’s
latest bioecological systems theory (Bronfenbrenner & Evans, 2000) as a perspective for
gathering my data.
Here is a summary of this framework and how it fits with my
study:
- Proximal processes: interactions
with family members, peers, caregivers – how these interactions influence the
child.
- Person characteristics: Who the
child is – their interests, way they communicate, position in the family etc
and how this impacts on their response to a house move.
- Context: Consider different
contexts for different case studies – basically identifying the reasons for the
move and trying to get case which provide a good comparison against context
variables.
- Time: Consider the longitudinal
aspect of the study – the child will have a different experience before and
after the move and their experience will continue to change over time.
Retrospective stories will also contribute to this.
Research which uses Bronfenbrenner
as their framework: (Anderson, Newman, et al., 2014; Anderson, Leventhal,
& Dupéré, 2014; Claudia Coulton, Francisca Richter, Seok Joo Kim, Robert
Fischer, 2016; Coley & Kull, 2016; Leventhal & Newman, 2010; Schmitt,
Finders, & McClelland, 2014; Schmitt & Lipscomb, 2016)
Following data gathering and
analysis, I will then utilise Bandura’s
Social learning/cognitive theory (Bandura, Caprara, Barbaranelli, Regalia, &
Scabini, 2011)
to support the development of support strategies.
This theory is as follows:
- Observational learning:
internal/external/vicarious reinforcement (behaviourist) – with social learning
theory a child can potentially identify with any other person (hence the use of
story books).
- Mediational processes: attention,
retention, reproduction and motivation. These are internal, mental events – we
choose whether or not to pay attention in the first place.
- Critical evaluation: Cognitive
control over behaviour, interaction between nature and nurture (biology and
environment).
- In education: self-efficacy
(mastery, vicarious, verbal persuasion, physiological and affective states).
Self-regulation, observational learning and reciprocal determination (triadic
reciprocal causation)
Research papers that use Bandura
as their theoretical framework: (Bamkin, Maynard, & Goulding, 2016; Bandura et
al., 2011; Greig, Taylor, & MacKay, 2011; Waid, 2014)
Bandura also cites
the work of (Krantz, 1998) in a piece following his
article (Bandura, 1998) who both agree that:
---- (Krantz, 1998,
p.87)
I’ve decided that I won’t go with using phenomenology as a
framework for this project, although it will clearly fall into this category at
many points – it would be too complex to try and work with this framework as
well.
It is described as this:
‘Phenomenology, as the word suggests,
is the study of phenomena, alternatively appearances. This notion of appearing
is, in turn, related to that of experience since things appear in experience.
Phenomenology can thus be described as the study of experience and of things as
experienced.’ (Smith, 2016, p.1)
It looks as though it would be a good framework to use, but
from further reading I can see that ‘Phenomenology offers neither causal explanations
nor therapeutic techniques’ (Fuchs, 2007, p.423). This means that by only
focusing on the phenomenon of moving house and the child’s experience of it
would not give me a big enough picture to help provide reasons for future
detrimental effects. Other case studies have considered this framework but not
used it (Bamkin et al., 2016).
‘According to Yin (2003) a case study
design should be considered when: (a) the focus of the study is to answer “how”
and “why” questions; (b) you cannot manipulate the behaviour of those involved
in the study; (c) you want to cover contextual conditions because you believe they
are relevant to the phenomenon under study; or (d) the boundaries are not clear
between the phenomenon and context.’ (Baxter & Jack, 2008, p.545)
‘Case studies are rich, empirical
descriptions of particular instances of a phenomenon that are typically based
on a variety of data sources (Yin, 1994).’ (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007, p.25)
References
Anderson, S., Leventhal, T., & Dupéré, V. (2014).
Residential mobility and the family context: A developmental approach. Journal
of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 70–78.
http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.11.004
Anderson, S., Newman, S., Dupéré, V., Leventhal, T., Newman,
S., & Dupéré, V. (2014). Residential Mobility Among Children: A Framework
for Child and Family Policy. Cityscape, 16(1), 5–36. Retrieved
from
http://libproxy.bath.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1517635669?accountid=17230%5Cnhttp://openurl.ac.uk/ukfed:bath.ac.uk?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ:abiglobal&atitle=Residenti
Bamkin, M., Maynard, S., & Goulding, A. (2016). Grounded
theory and ethnography combined. Journal of Documentation, 72(2),
214–231. http://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2015-0007
Bandura, A. (1998). Commentaries: Exploration of fortuitous
determinants of life paths. Psychological Enquiry, 9(2), 95–115.
Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Regalia, C.,
& Scabini, E. (2011). Impact of family efficacy beliefs on quality of
family functioning and satisfaction with family life. Applied Psychology,
60(3), 421–448. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00442.x
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study
Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The
Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. Retrieved from
http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental
science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research
designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9(1),
115–125. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00114
Claudia Coulton, Francisca Richter, Seok Joo Kim, Robert
Fischer, and Y. C. (2016). Leveraging Integrated
Data Systems to Examine the Effect of Housing and Neighborhood Conditions on
Kindergarten Readiness.
Coley, R. L., & Kull, M. (2016). Cumulative,
Timing-Specific, and Interactive Models of Residential Mobility and Children’s
Cognitive and Psychosocial Skills. Child Development, 87(4),
1204–1220. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12535
Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory Building
from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. The Academy of Management Journal,
50(1), 25–32. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159839
Fuchs, T. (2007). Psychotherapy of the lived space: A
phenomenological and ecological concept. American Journal of Psychotherapy,
61(4), 423–439.
Greig, A., Taylor, J., & MacKay, T. (2011). Doing
research with children: a practical guide. London: SAGE.
http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
Krantz, D. (1998). Taming chance: social science and everyday
narratives. Psychological Enquiry, 9(2), 87–94.
Leventhal, T., & Newman, S. (2010). Housing and child
development. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(9),
1165–1174. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.03.008
Schmitt, S., Finders, J., & McClelland, M. (2014).
Residential Mobility, Inhibitory Control, and Academic Achievement in
Preschool. Early Education and Development, 26(2), 189–208.
http://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.975033
Schmitt, S., & Lipscomb, S. (2016). Longitudinal
associations between residential mobility and early academic skills among
low-income children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36,
190–200. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.002
Smith, J. (2016). Experiencing phenomenology: an
introduction. London: Routledge.
Waid, J. (2014). Sibling Foster Care, Placement Stability,
and Well-Being: A Theoretical and Conceptual Framework. Journal of Family
Social Work, 17(October), 283–297.
http://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2014.885474