Sunday, 26 February 2017

Theoretical Frameworks for research

This entry is all about theoretical frameworks. After my PhD funding interview at Sussex (for which I was not successful) I had feedback which outlined where my proposal was lacking – in the framework area. So I’ve spent the past few days searching for whatever I can find on theoretical frameworks, and come to the conclusion that I was in the right place to begin with, using Bronfenbrenner’s latest bioecological systems theory (Bronfenbrenner & Evans, 2000) as a perspective for gathering my data. 

Here is a summary of this framework and how it fits with my study:
- Proximal processes: interactions with family members, peers, caregivers – how these interactions influence the child.
- Person characteristics: Who the child is – their interests, way they communicate, position in the family etc and how this impacts on their response to a house move.
- Context: Consider different contexts for different case studies – basically identifying the reasons for the move and trying to get case which provide a good comparison against context variables.
- Time: Consider the longitudinal aspect of the study – the child will have a different experience before and after the move and their experience will continue to change over time. Retrospective stories will also contribute to this.

Research which uses Bronfenbrenner as their framework: (Anderson, Newman, et al., 2014; Anderson, Leventhal, & Dupéré, 2014; Claudia Coulton, Francisca Richter, Seok Joo Kim, Robert Fischer, 2016; Coley & Kull, 2016; Leventhal & Newman, 2010; Schmitt, Finders, & McClelland, 2014; Schmitt & Lipscomb, 2016)

Following data gathering and analysis, I will then utilise Bandura’s Social learning/cognitive theory (Bandura, Caprara, Barbaranelli, Regalia, & Scabini, 2011) to support the development of support strategies. 

This theory is as follows:
- Observational learning: internal/external/vicarious reinforcement (behaviourist) – with social learning theory a child can potentially identify with any other person (hence the use of story books).
- Mediational processes: attention, retention, reproduction and motivation. These are internal, mental events – we choose whether or not to pay attention in the first place.
- Critical evaluation: Cognitive control over behaviour, interaction between nature and nurture (biology and environment).
- In education: self-efficacy (mastery, vicarious, verbal persuasion, physiological and affective states). Self-regulation, observational learning and reciprocal determination (triadic reciprocal causation)




Research papers that use Bandura as their theoretical framework: (Bamkin, Maynard, & Goulding, 2016; Bandura et al., 2011; Greig, Taylor, & MacKay, 2011; Waid, 2014)

Bandura also cites the work of (Krantz, 1998) in a piece following his article (Bandura, 1998) who both agree that:


---- (Krantz, 1998, p.87)

I’ve decided that I won’t go with using phenomenology as a framework for this project, although it will clearly fall into this category at many points – it would be too complex to try and work with this framework as well. 

It is described as this:
‘Phenomenology, as the word suggests, is the study of phenomena, alternatively appearances. This notion of appearing is, in turn, related to that of experience since things appear in experience. Phenomenology can thus be described as the study of experience and of things as experienced.’ (Smith, 2016, p.1)

It looks as though it would be a good framework to use, but from further reading I can see that ‘Phenomenology offers neither causal explanations nor therapeutic techniques’ (Fuchs, 2007, p.423). This means that by only focusing on the phenomenon of moving house and the child’s experience of it would not give me a big enough picture to help provide reasons for future detrimental effects. Other case studies have considered this framework but not used it (Bamkin et al., 2016).

‘According to Yin (2003) a case study design should be considered when: (a) the focus of the study is to answer “how” and “why” questions; (b) you cannot manipulate the behaviour of those involved in the study; (c) you want to cover contextual conditions because you believe they are relevant to the phenomenon under study; or (d) the boundaries are not clear between the phenomenon and context.’ (Baxter & Jack, 2008, p.545)

‘Case studies are rich, empirical descriptions of particular instances of a phenomenon that are typically based on a variety of data sources (Yin, 1994).’ (Eisenhardt & Graebner, 2007, p.25)


References
Anderson, S., Leventhal, T., & Dupéré, V. (2014). Residential mobility and the family context: A developmental approach. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 35(2), 70–78. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.appdev.2013.11.004
Anderson, S., Newman, S., Dupéré, V., Leventhal, T., Newman, S., & Dupéré, V. (2014). Residential Mobility Among Children: A Framework for Child and Family Policy. Cityscape, 16(1), 5–36. Retrieved from http://libproxy.bath.ac.uk/login?url=http://search.proquest.com/docview/1517635669?accountid=17230%5Cnhttp://openurl.ac.uk/ukfed:bath.ac.uk?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&genre=article&sid=ProQ:ProQ:abiglobal&atitle=Residenti
Bamkin, M., Maynard, S., & Goulding, A. (2016). Grounded theory and ethnography combined. Journal of Documentation, 72(2), 214–231. http://doi.org/10.1108/JD-01-2015-0007
Bandura, A. (1998). Commentaries: Exploration of fortuitous determinants of life paths. Psychological Enquiry, 9(2), 95–115.
Bandura, A., Caprara, G. V., Barbaranelli, C., Regalia, C., & Scabini, E. (2011). Impact of family efficacy beliefs on quality of family functioning and satisfaction with family life. Applied Psychology, 60(3), 421–448. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1464-0597.2010.00442.x
Baxter, P., & Jack, S. (2008). Qualitative Case Study Methodology: Study Design and Implementation for Novice Researchers. The Qualitative Report, 13(4), 544–559. Retrieved from http://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Evans, G. W. (2000). Developmental science in the 21st century: Emerging questions, theoretical models, research designs and empirical findings. Social Development, 9(1), 115–125. http://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9507.00114
Claudia Coulton, Francisca Richter, Seok Joo Kim, Robert Fischer,  and Y. C. (2016). Leveraging Integrated Data Systems to Examine the Effect of Housing and Neighborhood Conditions on Kindergarten Readiness.
Coley, R. L., & Kull, M. (2016). Cumulative, Timing-Specific, and Interactive Models of Residential Mobility and Children’s Cognitive and Psychosocial Skills. Child Development, 87(4), 1204–1220. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12535
Eisenhardt, K., & Graebner, M. (2007). Theory Building from Cases: Opportunities and Challenges. The Academy of Management Journal, 50(1), 25–32. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/20159839
Fuchs, T. (2007). Psychotherapy of the lived space: A phenomenological and ecological concept. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 61(4), 423–439.
Greig, A., Taylor, J., & MacKay, T. (2011). Doing research with children: a practical guide. London: SAGE. http://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909
Krantz, D. (1998). Taming chance: social science and everyday narratives. Psychological Enquiry, 9(2), 87–94.
Leventhal, T., & Newman, S. (2010). Housing and child development. Children and Youth Services Review, 32(9), 1165–1174. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2010.03.008
Schmitt, S., Finders, J., & McClelland, M. (2014). Residential Mobility, Inhibitory Control, and Academic Achievement in Preschool. Early Education and Development, 26(2), 189–208. http://doi.org/10.1080/10409289.2015.975033
Schmitt, S., & Lipscomb, S. (2016). Longitudinal associations between residential mobility and early academic skills among low-income children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 190–200. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2016.01.002
Smith, J. (2016). Experiencing phenomenology: an introduction. London: Routledge.


Waid, J. (2014). Sibling Foster Care, Placement Stability, and Well-Being: A Theoretical and Conceptual Framework. Journal of Family Social Work, 17(October), 283–297. http://doi.org/10.1080/10522158.2014.885474

Monday, 21 November 2016

Ethics in research with young children

Ethics is something which should underpin every research project; it is not a separate paragraph to be added on at the last minute or a disclaimer statement. It is also not just about minimising risks, but about maximising benefits too. As it is such a large subject, it requires quite a lengthy blog post! But I hope that this will inspire those who are considering undertaking research with young children, and give you some help and insight into the complexities of ethical issues.

Approaching research with young children holds many ethical dilemmas, some of which I hope to address in this post. This is by no means exhaustive. I am speaking from the viewpoint of my specific research project, which is learning about the experiences of young children aged 2-4 years when moving house. 

Accessing participants
In order to make my research ethical, it has to provide benefits for parenting and practice in the future. The only way I can do that is by having at least two case studies to provide cross case analysis as well as within case analysis. So I need to carefully consider how I access participants. This particular subject makes it even more tricky because participants need to be moving house at the time of the research taking place. Therefore, I have gathered a list of settings (nurseries, preschools and childminders) who are willing to identify appropriate families of children who access their services. This at present gives me access to over 500 families, so the likelihood of finding families who are moving should be positive. However, there is no guarantee that identified families will be willing to participate in my study. This is why it is so important to have access to such a large selection. If, however, I have several families come forward and do not think I will have the time to commit to field research with all of them, I will need to think of an ethical way around this. If I were to turn away families, it would be rude - so I need to think of other ways in which I can incorporate families' experiences which will not take much time, such as a one-off visit to the family after the move to discuss their experience. 

Gaining consent
Consent with adults is tricky enough to negotiate, but consent with young children is an ethical issues in itself. In order to provide informed consent, all participants need to know as much as possible about the implications of participating, We start with the initial invitation to participate, which will be given to parents/carers via the childcare setting. When they express an interest, further information needs to be given. This includes the childcare setting owners and practitioners and family members of the child as well as the child themselves. Because each type of participant will have a different type of role, I have made different information sheets for them. So there is information for settings, information for parents/carers and information for the child. Each of these correspond to a consent form, and also a separate consent form for each visit throughout the research for audio recording conversations (because there might be some days when they just don't want to be recorded). Some may not wish to read extensive information sheets, so this information is also going to be available in audio format on a website (www.movinghouseresearch.co.uk).
When it comes to consent/ongoing assent with young children, this comes down to the relationship built between the researcher and the child. I will need to be very careful to observe and sensitively understand if the child's body language is showing me they are uncomfortable. My role is to ensure that the child's voice is heard through my research, and I need to be aware of power relations because the child will likely look up to me as an adult. I need to ensure that the child understands their ability to guide the process, by explaining in child friendly language and reminding them regularly that they have control over what happens.

Data collection tools
I will be using the following tools for data collection: primarily audio recording, observing and writing notes, using children's drawings/mark making/artwork and also giving children the opportunity to take photographs of their favourite things/places in their old and new houses. The artwork and photographs are fairly easy to access; however, to take them away may not be an option if the child wants to keep them. I need to be aware of this and take steps to enable photographing their artwork and having copies of their photographs. Writing notes may not be easy to do when in the moment; there is also the possibility that I will forget exactly what was said or done and write it in a way which is biased towards what I want it to say. I need to be aware of this, and this is why I chose to use audio recordings as my primary method of data collection. This will ensure better accuracy of verbatim quotes. However, as I previously noted, some days people may not want to be recorded. In this case I will need to take notes, and need to be prepared for this every time I attend the field. If at any time throughout the process I find that a particular method of data collection is proving ineffective, I will need to stop using it and reflect on how I can improve my methods. This will help me to elicit the best data possible, to provide authentic stories of children's experiences, making the process more ethical. 

Analysis of data
If I take away the data and sit in a room by myself analysing it, there is a strong possibility that my analysis will include plenty of bias. I need to ensure that children and their families have input in the analysis, so there are some steps I will take in order to do this. When children create artwork or take a photograph, I will ask them to tell me about what they have done. I will correlate their thoughts with the artefacts, and go over these with them again to get a second view - which may be the same as the first, strengthening it - or may be different, thus creating further questions. Parents will also have the opportunity to be involved in this process of analysis, as their thoughts can also contribute to my understanding of the child and what they might be trying to say through their actions. When I have transcribed conversations with any of the participants, I will talk through these transcriptions with those people and see if they have anything to add - they may be in a different mood and have a different understanding on another day. Enabling them all to be a part of the analysis process will strengthen the data and help to create robust case studies with plenty of details to work with. 

Use of data
So where does it go from here? When the field research is complete and the data is analysed - if it comes to no use and is not shared, this would make the entire process unethical. The whole point of intervening in people's lives is to create change for the future and it needs to be worthwhile for those participants - they need to know that they have contributed to something that will help others in the future. One of the things that is important to consider here is my methodology; using the most effective methods will help to elicit the most helpful data - so methodology, although perhaps considered part of research design only, is also a huge part of ethics too. My methodology needs to continuously be fine-tuned as I am engaging in field research, in order to ensure its efficacy. 
I also need to consider how I am going to share the findings in appropriate ways. There are a number of possibilities; obviously I will need to write my project manuscript to hand in as my final assignment for the Master of Research. I can use this in a condensed format to submit an academic journal article - although I need to consider which journal I would like to submit to. This subject comes under many remits - early years, parenting, children's geographies - it is important to send the article in the right direction to have the best impact. I may even consider writing several articles from slightly different standpoints to cater for each perspective. But in order to get this information to the people who need it, it has to be disseminated in different ways. For a start, all participants will need to receive feedback, so a summary of the findings and suggested strategies for future practice will be given to all participants, as well as the families receiving a copy of their own child's case study. 
I will be presenting my findings at the International Festival of Childhood in June 2017 in Bath, and also creating an article for childcare practice to submit to Early Years Educator - to reach practitioners directly. 

Data protection
Of course with anything involving human participants, it is really important to ensure the safety and confidentiality of the data. Anything that is on paper, I will keep in a locked filing cabinet. Anything that is electronic, I will keep on my password protected computer. Names and identifying features will all be removed on electronic records so even if there was a breach of privacy, participants could not be identified. If I make this explicitly clear to participants, it should help to put their minds at ease and be open about their experiences, knowing that their data is going to be safe and protected.

Additional data
Whenever I have talked about my research, there have always been stories that people wish to share with me. Even conversing casually with a stranger at an exhibition, he shared an enlightening story with me about a childhood move and how it has affected his entire life. Having seen how engaging this subject seems to be for a lot of people, I have decided to include a further study of retrospective stories. These will not necessarily be included in my Masters manuscript, but will certainly be taken forward for my PhD thesis. To this end, I have created a further information sheet which contains the information, a box to write their story in, and boxes to tick for consent. These stories will be anonymous - I will be the only person who knows who sent them to me. I think it is an important aspect of the subject, because when people look back, they can see the impact a situation has had on their lives and place it in a social ecological context, rather than just the facts and figures that quantitative research has explored. For my PhD, this will triangulate my evidence - the review of literature, the retrospective stories and the children's direct experiences. Correlating and contrasting these three things should help me to identify some really interesting points that are worth considering for the future. 

Wednesday, 9 November 2016

Master of Research: Reflective Blog 2

It's been about six weeks since I started this course. and I already feel like I've been on a huge journey of in depth learning. Creating my own schedule of lectures to attend was a challenge, but it has helped me to really reflect on where my strengths and weaknesses are and what I need to focus on. I've attended what feels like so many lectures, each with a specific aim, and have reflected on my learning from each, applying it to my project.
Today was an interesting turning point. During a lecture on ethics, we were asked to look at different scenarios of research and consider the ethical issues that might be involved. I found this really difficult as I had been considering the ethical implications of my own project and couldn't see past that. The lecturer said I needed to step out of 'my' project and look at it 'from above' - to consider research in general rather than so specifically concentrating on what I personally need to do for this project only. She also said that the aim of our research this time around is not to change the world, but to gain a master's degree. I have to disagree with that - primarily because I'm doing the degree in order to be able to do the research. This subject is so important to me that I really haven't focused on the fact that it's gaining me a qualification in the process!
I've started compiling a list of settings who are willing to help me access participants and so far have four settings - with a combined client base of over 500 families. The more settings I have on board, the higher the likelihood that I will find the perfect families to create case studies. There are so many things to consider, and as I've always thought, all of the considerations involve ethics of some sort which underpin the whole project. I have to ensure that the information I give to parents covers any eventuality so that the children, their families and even myself are protected. I can't gain ethical approval without putting all of this information in writing first, so that is what I am focusing on at the moment. When I have completed all the forms I need to create to submit for my ethical application, I will write a blog post purely about ethics.
Alongside this, I've got the information I gained from reading the literature kept in the back of my mind. The research will be more valid if I triangulate my evidence - what I have read cross referenced with things the children do/say and things the adults around them do/say. The initial work I'm doing now will form the basis of the research and is foundational - it has to be done to be safely built upon.

Monday, 17 October 2016

Moving house: Attachment, the social ecological context and the process of transition and grief

Life and childhood can be viewed from a number of perspectives, but personally I like to see each child as part of a whole system within which they interact, learn, develop, adapt and exist. This is known as the Social Ecological Model (Bronfenbrenner, 1979), where the individual is centred and surrounded by those closest to them (family and friends), those who they interact with sometimes (settings, schools, gp etc), and those whose decisions affect their lives (government, society). The diagram below shows how this works:


A huge part of a child's wellbeing is for this model to remain stable; and this is where attachment becomes vitally important. Bowlby (1907-1990) came up with the theory that having secure attachments to others is part of human survival, and that children need at least one secure attachment in order to feel safe and to enable the child to explore their environment, knowing there is someone to turn to when they are in need. When a child's housing is stable, it enables these relationships to remain stable, giving the child a chance to develop good, strong attachments to their caregivers and to developmentally thrive. Personally, I also think that children develop attachments to environments and possessions, as experience tells me that children struggle when their environment changes (and even more so for some children with autistic spectrum condition).

Therefore, the issue of moving house is actually quite a big thing. Not only is it important that a child feels safe with their attachment figure, but that they also feel safe when in a familiar context. Moving house can disrupt this attachment and cause the child to react in a number of ways. Coley and Kull (2016) designed a study to see how children's cognitive abilities were affected by moving house; their study actually found that although cognitive abilities were slightly affected, the main issues were emotional and behavioural. They suggested that having to establish new routines, new support systems within the immediate community and changes in family dynamics as a result of moving could have a negative impact on children's emotions, specifically because of the disruption to the child's attachments.

As humans, we go through a process of transition that we as adults can see and understand quite clearly if we look carefully at the following graph:

However, children who are too young to express their emotions fully, with limited vocabulary and an inability to understand the situation they are going through will take a lot longer to get through this process than those of us who have experience and understand what is happening. Now have a look at this image showing the cycle of grief, and see the similarities:


So, in effect, when a child moves house, not only are they going to struggle to maintain their strong attachments, but will also be going through a process of grieving for the previous environment. This is not to say the process is long and arduous for every child, as for some who are articulate and creative thinkers will whizz through this so quickly you barely notice they've been affected at all! But it is worth thinking about how to approach a transition such as this, in order to support the child through this process.

Linking this to my previous post about housing statistics, how renting is on the rise and those renting tend to move house more frequently than homeowners, this becomes a very important issue. During my study I will be carefully observing the attachments children have with their caregivers and I hope to gain a better understanding of what we (parents and practitioners) can actually do to avoid children dragging through the transition process, or remaining at the low point for too long. If they are likely to move house more frequently, they need to learn their own coping mechanisms which is the development of resilience - a subject for another day!


References

Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. (Republished in 2006).

Coley, R. L., & Kull, M. (2016). Cumulative, Timing-Specific, and Interactive Models of Residential Mobility and Children’s Cognitive and Psychosocial Skills. Child Development, 87(4), 1204–1220. http://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.12535

Friday, 14 October 2016

Housing statistics in the UK

Today I have been looking at the English Housing Survey 2014-15 dataset, showing the percentages of families who rent privately, socially and also first time buyers. The analysis shows a comparison to the previous two waves of data collected in 2010-11 and 2004-5.

The interesting thing I have found and its implications for my research is this; renting (either socially or privately) is on the increase, in comparison to those buying homes, which are decreasing. The most important statistic about this is that the number of years families remain in their properties is far fewer in social rental properties than in owned properties, and even fewer years in privately rented properties. Here's a quote from the Social Rented Sector Report:

'In 2014-15, 39% of all social renters had lived at their current property for less than five years, very similar to the proportion in 1994-95 (40%). Social renters had lived at their current address for an average of 11.4 years, in comparison with 4.0 years for private renters and 17.5 years for owner occupiers.' (DCLG, 2015)

So if renting is on the increase, and renting means moving house more frequently, what does this mean for the UK's children? To me, it means this research is all the more important.

Thursday, 13 October 2016

Reviewing the literature


So this is starting at the very beginning. I need to unpick the keywords to search for literature. This small mindmap is just an example of how I have begun this process! Yesterday I attended a session at the university library where we were shown the most effective ways of searching for and finding the literature we need to review. I'm quite lucky that my search terms are so specific, because it narrows down the literature to that which is relevant to my study. To write an effective literature review, you need to find ALL of the articles/books etc that relate to your subject, including previously submitted PhD theses! After a search of the theses library I am happy to say that my topic has not been studied before for a PhD so I already feel like I'm gazing into a gap in the literature - although previous journal articles show studies into this topic, they do not directly consult with young children, so this is my specific niche.

There are so many more things I need to look at other than these particular terms, because at the end of my review I will be making a case for my study. This means I need to also find ethnographic case studies involving children and how much richer the data can be using this methodology. Every aspect of my study needs to be backed up by previous literature, so my search will take time and lots of effort. I hope to share my findings throughout this process so if you are interested in this topic, please do follow it.